An enduring feature of Christian religious life has been the experience of the demonic. This experience can be found in the New Testament, most obviously in reported encounters with demons, but more centrally in the language of spiritual warfare that pervades much of the Pauline literature. In the Patristic period, these ideas were cemented in the Christian tradition in the writings of the Desert Fathers. A phenomenological understanding of experience holds that percepts have qualities that are inherently given as part of the experience, and that these qualities can be observed through the use of phenomenological concepts. An examination of the writings of the Desert Fathers suggests that one inherent quality of some religious experiences is their externality. Thoughts or feelings within the person are perceived as having an external source, and external threats can take on an embodied quality in perception, as in visions of demonic beings. These experiences have their initial constitution in an Otherness centered in the body. On reflection, it is not surprising that we would find a quality of externality in religious experience. Religion and spirituality deal with our relationship to the broader world around us. Recent phenomenological writings by Levinas and Marion have begun to recover the importance of externality, however, they neglect aspects of demonic experiences such as their negative valence. Critics of the demonic have tried hard to expel the idea from Western consciousness, pointing to tragic experiences in early modern history and the apparent need to posit the existence of immaterial entities. However, a careful phenomenological and historical analysis casts serious doubt on this modernist picture. The abandonment of the demonic in much of Christian religious thought and practice carries negative consequences, as it invalidates the external quality of many difficult religious experiences. A recovery of the concept of the demonic would help us better understand the phenomenology of religious life.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Ales Bello, Angela. “The language of our living body.” In A-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Analecta Husserliana: The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research, Volume LXXXIX: Logos of Phenomenology and Phenomenology of the Logos, Book Two, 3-14. Dordrecht, NL: Springer; 2006.
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae (8 vols.) (L. Shapcote, Tr, J. Mortensen & E. Alarcon, Eds). Lander, WY: Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012.
Athanasius. Athanasius: The Life of Antony and the Letter to Marcellinus (R. Gregg, Tr.). Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1980.
Augustine, St. The City of God, 11-24 (W. Babcock, Tr.). Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 2013.
Behnke, Elizabeth. “Edmund Husserl’s contribution to phenomenology of the body in Ideas II.” In T. Nenon & L. Embree (Eds.), Issues in Husserl’s Ideas II,135-160. Dordrecht, NL: Springer, 1996.
Brakke, David. Demons and the Making of the Monk: Spiritual Combat in Early Christianity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.
Brentano, Franz. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (O. Kraus & L. McAlister, Eds., A. Rancurello, D. Terrell & L. McAlister, Trs.). London: Routledge, 2009.
Caciola, Nancy. Discerning Spirits: Divine and Demonic Possession in the Middle Ages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003.
Cassian, John. John Cassian: The Conferences (B. Ramsey, Tr.). New York: Paulist, 1997.
Chakravartty, Anjan. A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Clark, Stuart. Thinking with Demons: The Idea of Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Clarke, Desmond. Descartes’s Theory of Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.
Dahl, Espen. Phenomenology and the Holy: Religious Experience after Husserl. London: SCM Press, 2010.
Dalton, Drew. “Otherwise than nothing: Heidegger, Levinas and the phenomenology of evil.” Philosophy & Theology, 21 (2009), 105-128.
Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Dawkins, Richard. The Extended Phenotype (rev. ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
de Certeau, Michel. The Possession at Loudun (M. Smith, Tr.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Descartes, René. “Discourse on Method.” In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff & D. Murdoxh (Trs.), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Volume 1 (pp. 111-151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
Descartes, René. “Meditations on First Philosophy.” In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff & D. Murdoch (Trs.), The Philosophical writings of Descartes, Volume 2, 3-62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
Descartes, René. “Passions of the Soul.” In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff & D. Murdoch (Trs.), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Volume 1, 326-404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
Dickson, Paul. “The phenomenology of evil.” Journal of Value Inquiry, 29 (1995), 5-17.
Dorotheos of Gaza. Discourses and Sayings (E. Wheeler, Tr.). Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1977.
Driscoll, Jeremy. Steps to Spiritual Perfection: Studies on Spiritual Progress in Evagrius Ponticus. New York: Newman Press, 2005
Driver, Steven. John Cassian and the Reading of Egyptian Monastic Culture. New York: Routledge, 2002.
Duyndam, Joachim. “Girard and Levinas, Cain and Abel, mimesis and the face.” Contagion: Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture, 15-16 (2008/9), 237-248.
Ely, Peter. “Revisiting Paul Ricoeur on the symbolism of evil: A theological retrieval.” Ultimate Reality and Meaning, 24 (2001), 40-64.
Evagrius Ponticus. The Praktikos: Chapters on Prayer (J. Bamberger, Tr.). Spencer, MA: Cistercian Press, 1972.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method (2nd rev. ed.) (J. Weinsheimer & D. Marshall, Trs.). New York: Continuum, 1989.
Galetti, Dino. “Of Levinas’ ‘structure’ in address to his four ‘others’.” Continental Philosophy Review, 49 (2016), 509-532.
Garver, Margaret. Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
Geniušas, Saulius. “Self-consciousness and Otherness: Hegel and Husserl.” Santalka: Filosofija, 16 (2008), 27-36. DOI: 10.3846/1822-430X.2008.16.3.27-36.
Goux, Jean-Joseph. “On the trace of Emmanuel Levinas: The face of the Other at the risk of the incommensurable.” Philosophy Today, 55 (2011), 386-391.
Greenfield, Richard. Traditions of Belief in Late Byzantine Demonology. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert, 1988.
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trs.). New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 1962.
Hippocrates. “On Regimen in Acute Diseases.” In W. Jones (Tr.), Hippocrates, Volume II: Prognostic, 57-126. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1923.
Hippocrates. “The Sacred Disease.” In W. Jones (Tr.), Hippocrates, Volume II: Prognostic, 127-184. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1923.
Horden, Peregrine. “Responses to possession and insanity in the earlier Byzantine world.” Social History of Medicine, 6 (1993), 177-194.
Husserl, Edmund. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology (W. Gibson, Tr.). London: George Allen & Unwin, 1931.
Husserl, Edmund. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy (D. Carr, Tr.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1970.
Husserl, Edmund. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology (D. Cairns, Tr.). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, 1973.
Open Theology is an international Open Access, peer-reviewed academic journal that welcomes contributions written in English addressing religion in its various forms and aspects: historical, theological, sociological, psychological, and other.