Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) or “drones” have become a core component of the US military arsenal following September 11, 2001. In much of the literature and public discourse regarding drones, it is assumed that drone policy is created within the broader “public interest.” That is, those who construct drone policy set aside private incentives and other motives to construct policy solely to achieve the goals of US citizens and maximize some larger social welfare function. This paper identifies the conjectures associated with this public interest ideal and examines their accuracy. I find a general disconnect between the evidence and the public interest assumption. In several cases, the evidence directly contradicts the assumption of public interest. In light of these findings I offer an alternative analytical framework, the “public choice” framework to adjudicate between observed realities and stated goals.
Hall, Abigail R., Coyne Christopher J. (2014), The Political Economy of Drones, Defence and Peace Economics, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 445–460.
Harder, Donelle, Heisten Jake (2012) Inhofe, Manchin Announce Senate Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Caucus. Senator James M. Inhofe Press Releases, September 27. Available online at: http://inhofe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm? FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=08e3e107-d52f-8498-6a8fba7c980631aa.
The main objectives of Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy are to further research in Peace Science and Peace Economics, to expose the scholarly community to innovative peace-related research, to disseminate the study of peace economics to a wider audience.