Buying Friends? The Importance of Economic Flows in Assembling the Iraq War Coalition

Robert Riegler 1 , Piotr Lis 1 ,  and Mehtap Hisarciklilar 2
  • 1 Coventry University Business School, School of Economics, Finance and Accounting, Priory Street, Coventry, CV1 5FB, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • 2 Staffordshire University, School of Business, Leadership and Economics, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DF, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Robert Riegler
  • Corresponding author
  • Coventry University Business School, School of Economics, Finance and Accounting, Priory Street, Coventry, CV1 5FB, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar
, Piotr Lis
  • Coventry University Business School, School of Economics, Finance and Accounting, Priory Street, Coventry, CV1 5FB, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar
and Mehtap Hisarciklilar
  • Staffordshire University, School of Business, Leadership and Economics, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DF, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar

Abstract

Economic ties between countries are likely to influence the alignment of their international policies. This paper investigates whether countries’ historical economic ties with the United States and their expectation of changes in future economic flows had a role in their decision to join the US-led coalition in Iraq from 2003 onwards. We use data on 115 countries over the period 2003–2009 to estimate panel random effects probit models of war coalition participation. We measure the intensity of economic ties with three variables: bilateral trade flows between the partner country and the US as well as FDI and aid flows from the US to the partner country. Our results suggest that both good trade relations prior to the conflict and the prospects of their further improvements increase the willingness of countries to join the coalition. In spite of the anecdotal evidence, we find no empirical evidence that the dependence on American FDI or aid affected countries’ decision on Iraq war participation.

  • Arvanitidis, P., Kollias, C. & Messis, P. (2017). Converging allies? Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 23, 1–15.

  • Bailey, M. A., Strezhnev, A. & Voeten, E. (2017). Estimating dynamic state preferences from United Nations voting data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61, 430–456.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Bandyopadhyay, S., Lahiri, S. & Younas, J. (2015). Financing growth through foreign aid and private foreign loans: Nonlinearities and complementarities. Journal of International Money and Finance, 56, 75–96.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Berkok, U. G. (2013). Shape and consequences of military missions: An introduction. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 19, 1–7.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Breslow, J. M. (2016). Colin Powell: U.N. speech was a great intelligence failure Frontline, PBS.org.

  • Center for Systemic Peace. Polity IV Project. 2016.

  • Corbetta, R. & Dixon, W. J. (2004). Multilateralism, major powers, and militarized disputes. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 5–14.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Corbetta, R., Volgy, T. J. & Rhamey, J. P. (2013). Major power status (in)consistency and political relevance in international relations studies. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 19, 291–307.

  • Dreher, A., Nunnenkamp, P. & Thiele, R. (2008). Does US aid buy UN general assembly votes? A disaggregated analysis. Public Choice, 136, 139–164.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Fleck, R. K. & Kilby, C. (2010). Changing aid regimes? U.S. foreign aid from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Journal of Development Economics, 91, 185–197.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Gibler, D. M. (2009). International military alliances, 1648–2008. Washington, DCQ2: Please check and confirm the publisher location for Ref. “Gibler (2009)”: Congressional Quarterly Press.

  • Jude, C. & Silaghi, M. I. P. (2016). Employment effects of foreign direct investment: New evidence from Central and Eastern European countries. International Economics, 145, 32–49.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Kimball, A. L. (2006). Alliance formation and conflict initiation: The missing link. Journal of Peace Research, 43, 371–389.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Lis, P. (2014). Terrorism, armed conflict and foreign aid. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 20, 655–667.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Mayer, T. & Zignago, S. (2011). Notes on cepii’s distances measures: The geodist database Working Papers 2011-25, CEPII, http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/publications/wp/abstract.asp?NoDoc=3877.

  • Newnham, R. (2008). Coalition of the bribed and bullied? U.S. economic linkage and the Iraq War Coalition. International Studies Perspectives, 9, 183–200.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Nieman, M. D. (2016). Moments in time: Temporal patterns in the effect of democracy and trade on conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 33, 273–293.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Pandya, S. S. (2016). Political economy of foreign direct investment: Globalized production in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 455–475.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • SIPRI. (2017). Sipri military expenditure database https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex.

  • Sprecher, C. & Krause, V. (2006). Alliances, armed conflict, and cooperation: Theoretical approaches and empirical evidence. Journal of Peace Research, 43, 363–369.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Tago, A. (2007). Why do states join US-led military coalitions?: The compulsion of the coalition’s missions and legitimacy. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7, 179–202.

  • U.S. Agency for International Development. (2016). Foreign aid explorer: The official record of U.S. foreign aid https://explorer.usaid.gov/data.html.

  • Vucetic, S. (2011). Bound to follow? The Anglosphere and US-led coalitions of the willing, 1950–2001. European Journal of International Relations, 17, 27–49.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

The main objectives of Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy are to further research in Peace Science and Peace Economics, to expose the scholarly community to innovative peace-related research, to disseminate the study of peace economics to a wider audience.

Search