The use of service robots to assist ageing people
in their own homes has the potential to allow people
to maintain their independence, increasing their health
and quality of life. In many assistive applications, robots
perform tasks on people’s behalf that they are unable or
unwilling to monitor directly. It is important that users
be given useful and appropriate information about task
progress. People being assisted in homes and other realworld
environments are likely be engaged in other activities
while they wait for a service, so information should
also be presented in an appropriate, nonintrusive manner.
This paper presents a human-robot interaction experiment
investigatingwhat type of feedback people prefer in verbal
updates by a service robot about distributed assistive services.
People found feedback about time until task completion
more useful than feedback about events in task
progress or no feedback. We also discuss future research
directions that involve giving non-expert users more input
into the task planning process when delays or failures occur
that necessitate replanning or modifying goals.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
 F. Cavallo, M. Aquilano, M. C. Carrozza, and P. Dario, “Robot-era
project: The vision of 3d service robotics,” in Proceedings of the
International Society for Gerontechnology 8thWorld Conference
on Gerontechnology, ser. ISG*ISARC ’12, 2012.
 M. Di Rocco, S. Sathyakeerthy, J. Grosinger, F. Pecora, A. Saffiotti,
M. Bonaccorsi, F. Cavallo, R. Limosani, A. Manzi, G. Teti,
and P. Dario, “A planner for ambient assisted living: From highlevel
reasoning to low-level robot execution and back.” in AAAI
Spring Symposium: Qualitative Representations for Robots, ser.
AAAI Technical Report, vol. SS-14-06. AAAI, 2014.
 F. Broz, A. Di Nuovo, T. Belpaeme, and A. Cangelosi, “Multimodal
robot feedback for eldercare,” in Workshop on Robot Feedback
in Human-Robot Interaction: How to make a Robot Readable for
a Human Interaction Partner at IEEE International Symposium on
Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ser. Ro-Man ’12,
 A. Di Nuovo, F. Broz, T. Belpaeme, and A. Cangelosi, “A web
based multi-modal interface for elderly users of the robot-era
multi-robot services,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International
Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, ser. SMC’14,
 F. Marcellini, R. Bevilacqua, S. Klemcke, F. Pecora, M. Aquilano,
and F. Cavallo. (2012) Report on the robotic service analysiswith
respect to elderly users, ROBOT-ERA deliverable D2.1.
 M. Marge, A. Pappu, B. Frisch, T. K. Harris, and A. I. Rudnicky,
“Exploring spoken dialog interaction in human-robot teams,”
in Robots, Games, and Research: Success stories in USARSim
Workshop at IROS, ser. IROS ’09, 2009.
 S. Rosenthal and M. M. Veloso, “Mixed-initiative long-term interactions
with an all-day-companion robot.” in AAAI Fall Symposium:
Dialog with Robots, ser. AAAI Technical Report, vol. FS-
10-05. AAAI, 2010.
 M. R. McGee-Lennon, M. K. Wolters, and S. Brewster, “Usercentred
multimodal reminders for assistive living,” in Proceedings
of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems, ser. CHI ’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 2105–
2114. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.
 T. Bickmore, D. Mauer, F. Crespo, and T. Brown, “Negotiating
task interruptions with virtual agents for health
behavior change,” in Proceedings of the 7th International
Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
- Volume 3, ser. AAMAS ’08. Richland, SC: International
Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent
Systems, 2008, pp. 1241–1244. [Online]. Available:
 D. Warnock, M. McGee-Lennon, and S. Brewster, “Multiple
notification modalities and older users,” in Proceedings of
the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
ser. CHI ’13. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2013, pp. 1091–
1094. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2470654.
 A. Leeper, K. Hsiao, M. Ciocarlie, L. Takayama, and D. Gossow,
“Strategies for human-in-the-loop robotic grasping,” in Human-
Robot Interaction (HRI), 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference
on, March 2012, pp. 1–8.
 C. A. Miller and R. Parasuraman, “Designing for flexible interaction
between humans and automation: delegation interfaces for
supervisory control,” Human Factors, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 57–75,
 E. M. Roth, M. L. Hanson, C. Hopkins, V. Mancuso, and G. L.
Zacharias, “Human in the loop evaluation of a mixed-initiative
system for planning and control of multiple uav teams,” Proceedings
of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual
Meeting, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 280–284, 2004.
 F. Cavallo, R. Limosani, A. Manzi, M. Bonaccorsi, R. Esposito,
M. Di Rocco, F. Pecora, G. Teti, A. Saflotti, and P. Dario,
“Development of a socially believable multi-robot solution from
town to home,” Cognitive Computation, pp. 1–14, 2014. [Online].
 “Acapela voice as a service,” http://www.acapela-vaas.com.
 M. Di Rocco, F. Pecora, and A. Saflotti, “When robots are late:
Configuration planning for multiple robots with dynamic goals,”
in Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2013 IEEE/RSJ International
Conference on, Nov 2013, pp. 9515–5922.
Paladyn. Journal of Behavioral Robotics is a fully peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original, high-quality research works and review articles on topics broadly related to neuronally and psychologically inspired robots and other behaving autonomous systems. The journal is indexed in SCOPUS.