Masahiro Mori’s Buddhist philosophy of robot

Takeshi Kimura 1
  • 1 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Tsukuba, , Tsukuba, Japan


Masahiro Mori is a well-known Japanese robotics scholar whose notion of Uncanny Valley is worldly famous. Mori is also an initiator of the Robot Contest and a student of Buddhism and a practitioner of Zen. He constructs his original Buddhist philosophy of robotics throughout his career. His robotics work and his learning of Buddhism develop together side by side in an interesting intertwined manner. This paper will take up the issues such as the ethical personality, quality of minds, and experiences of engineers as key components in and for an “ethical design” of robots by examining Mori’s Buddhist philosophy of robotics. This paper is divided into four sections. After an introductory part, in the second section, we will explore Mori’s view of Zen as aspiritual source for technological creativity. In Section 3, we will examine his view into a robot-contest as a location of a realized teaching of Buddhism, especially, in relationship to the Diamond Sūtra, in order to see Mori’s educational contribution. In Section 4, we will examine how Mori became engaged to learn and practice Buddhism and came to the realization of Buddhahood in relation to robotics.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] G. Veruggio, J. Solis, M. Van der Loos, Roboethics: Ethics applied to robotics, IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine, 2011, 18, 21-22

  • [2] J. P. Sullins, Introduction: Open questions in roboethics, Philosophy & Technology, 2011, 24, 233-238

  • [3] S. Steinert, The five robots - A taxonomy for roboethics, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2014, 6(2), 249-260

  • [4] R. Capurro, M. Nagenborg, Ethics and robotics, Akademishce Verlagsgesellschaft, Heidelberg, 2009

  • [5] R. Geraci, Apocalyptic AI: Visions of Heaven in Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, and Virtual Reality, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010

  • [6] A. Forest, God in the machine: What robots teach us about humanity and God, A Plume Book, Penguin Group, New York, 2005

  • [7] Y. J. Amuda, I. Tijani, Ethical and legal implications of sex robot: Islamic perspective, OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2012, 3, 19-28

  • [8] R. Hashin, H. Yussof, N. Liyana, Z. Bahrin, Religious perceptions on the use of humanoid for spiritual augmentation of children with autism, Procedia Computer Science, 2017, 105, 353-358

  • [9] D. Halpern, J. E. Katz, Unveiling robotophobia and cyberdystopianism: The role of gender, technology, and religion on attitudes towards robots, Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, 2012, 139-140

  • [10] C. B. Jensen, A. Blok, Techno-animism in Japan: Shinto cosmograms, actor-network theory, and the enabling powers of nonhuman agencies, Theory, Culture & Society, 2013, 30, 84-115

  • [11] N. Kitano, Animism, Rinri, modernization; The base of Japanese robotics, Workshop on Roboethics, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’07), Roma, Italy, 10-14 April 2007,

  • [12] N. Kageki, An uncanny mind: Masahiro Mori on the uncanny valley and beyond, IEEE Spectrum, 2012, 12th June, mind-masahiro-mori-on-the-uncanny-valley

  • [13] M. Mori, The uncanny valley: The original essay by Masahiro Mori, IEEE Spectrum, 2012, 12th June,

  • [14] The uncanny valley revisited: A tribute to Masahiro Mori, Special Session, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Robots and Intelligent System, 2013, (accessed 24 January 2018)

  • [15] P. Smith, Of ‘near pollution’ and non-linear cultural effects: Reflections on Masahiro Mori and the uncanny valley, American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 2014, 2, 329-347

  • [16] D. Hanson, A. Olney, I. A. Pereira, M. Zielke, Upending the uncanny valley, (accessed 24 January 2018)

  • [17] K. Richardson, Technological animism: The uncanny personhood of humanoidmachines, Social Analysis, 2016, 60, 110-128

  • [18] S. Batchelor, Secular Buddhism: Imagining the Dharma in an uncertain world, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 2017

  • [19] B. Szerszynski, Nature, technology and the sacred, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2005

  • [20] R. Roy, Religion/technology, not theology/science, as the defining dichotomy, Zygon, 2002, 37, 667-676

  • [21] R. Roy, Scientism and Technology as Religions, Zygon, 2005, 40, 835-844

  • [22] P. Koslowski (Ed.), Nature and technology in the world religions, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrcht/Boston/London, 2002

  • [23] J. Stolow, Introduction: Religion, Technology, and the Things in Between, In: J. Stolow (Ed.), Deus in Machina: Religion, Technology, and the Things in Between, Fordham University Press, New York, 2013, 5

  • [24] N. Herzfeld (Ed.), Religion and the New Technologies, MDPI Books, Basel, 2017

  • [25] T. Kimura, Robotics and AI in the sociology of religion: A human in imago roboticae, Social Compass, 2017, 64(1), 6-22

  • [26] R. K. Payne, Cognitive science and classical Buddhist philosophy of mind, The Routledge Companion to Religion and Science Routledge, (accessed 27 December 2017)

  • [27] J. Hughes, Compassionate AI and selfless robots: A Buddhist approach, In: P. Lin, K. Abney, G. A. Bekey (Eds.), Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England, 2012, 69-84

  • [28] M. Mori, Atama no jiyū jizaigaku (Liberty in Brain), Kōdansha, Tokyo, 1993

  • [29] D. R. Oflcer, The unexplored relationship between intuition and innovation, The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 2005, 10, 1-10

  • [30] S. A. Schwartz, Creativity, intuition, and innovation, Subtle Energies, 1990, 1, i-x

  • [31] M. H. Raidl, T. I. Lubart, An empirical study of intuition and creativity, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 2000-2001, 20, 217-230

  • [32] E. Marder, Understanding brains: Details, intuition, and big date, PLOS Biology, 2015, 13, 1-6

  • [33] K. Eling, F. Langerak, A. Grifln, The performance effects of combining rationality and intuition in making early new product idea evaluation, Decisions, Creativity and Innovation Management, 2015, 24, 464-478

  • [34] M. Mori, Roboto kontesuto no kyōiku teki igi (EducationalMeaning of Robot Contest), Gakushi Kaihō, 2001, 833,

  • [35] M. Mori, Robo-kon no ningen kyōikuteki igi (The Meaning of the ROBOT-CONTEST for the Human Education), Nihon Robot Gakkaishi, 2009, 27(9), 964-966

  • [36] M. Mori, Y. Shimoyama, Y. Tanaka, K. Mori, Robokon sūpa chūgakko: Hachinohe Sanchū no netto (Robot Contest, Super Junior High School: Enthusiasm at Hachinohe Third Junior High School), INAX Shuppan, Tokyo, 2000, 1-70

  • [37] M. Mori, Bukkyō Shinron (New Study on Buddhism), Kōsei Publishing Co. Ltd., Tokyo, 2013, 94

  • [38] S. Nagatomo, The logic of the Diamond Sūtra: A is not A, therefore it is A, Asian Philosophy, 2000, 10, 215

  • [39] J. Menefee, Dostoevsky and the Diamond Sūtra: Jack Kerouac’s Karamazov religion, Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 2011, 53, 431-454

  • [40] A. Martin, Pepper the robot to don Buddhist robe for its new funeral services role, The Japan Times, 2017, 16 August,

  • [41] L. Walker, Japan’s robot dogs get funerals as Sony looks away, Newsweek, 2015, 8 March,

  • [42] E. Gotō, Fukanbun (Preface) to Mori, M., Bukkyō Shinron (New Essays on Buddhism), Kōsei huppansha, Tokyo, 2013, 1-5

  • [43] M. Mori, Y. Morita, Keisoku, Seigyo Kōgaku (Measurement and Instrumentation, Control Engineering), Hōsō Daigaku Kyōiku Shinkōkai (Air University), Tokyo, 1995, 1-238

  • [44] M. Mori, Kikai Buhin no Makuno Uchi Bentō: Roboto hakase no sōzō heno tobira (Lunch Box with Mechanical Parts: Dr. Robot’s door to Creativity), Ohmsha, Tokyo, 2003, 1-230

  • [45] M. Mori, Roboto Kōgaku to Ningen: Mirai no tameno roboto kōgaku (Robotics Philosophy and Human: Robotics Engineering for the Future Generation), Ohmsha, Tokyo, 2014, 1-410

  • [46] M. Mori, Mori Masahiro no Bukkyō Nyūmon (Mori Masahiro’s Introduction to Buddhism), Kōsei Shuppan, Tokyo, 2003, 1-284

  • [47] M. Mori, Oyako Bukkyō Nyūmon (Introduction to Buddhism for Parents-Children), Gentōsha, Tokyo, 2011, 1-240

  • [48] M. Mori, Ima wo Ikiteiku Chikara: Rokuharamitsu (Power to Live: Six Paramita), Kyoiku Hyōronsha, Tokyo, 2009, 1-141

  • [49] M. Mori, Bukkyō Shinron (New Essays on Buddhism), Kōsei Shuppansha, Tokyo, 2013, 1-264

  • [50] M. Mori, Ikimono no dezain: Mori Masahiro saiensu taidan (Biological Design: Conversation with Dr. Masahiro Mori), Nihon Keizai Shinbunsha, Tokyo, 1980, 1-229

  • [51] The Gateless Barrier: The Wu-Men Kuan (Mumonkan), translated and with commentary by R. Aitken, North Point Press, A division of Farrar, Straus and Giroux ebook, New York, 2015. Case 1: Chao-chou’s Dog reads, A monk asked Chao-chou, “Does the dog have Buddha nature or not?” Chao-chou said, “Mu.”,

  • [52] D. McDermott, What Matters to a Machine?, In: M. Anderson, S. L. Anderson (Eds.), Machine Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011, 88-114


Journal + Issues