Inter-speaker variation, Optimality theory, and the prosody of clitic left-dislocations in Spanish

Ingo Feldhausen 1
  • 1 Institut für Romanische Sprachen und Literaturen, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Norbert-Wollheim-Platz 1, D-60629 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Ingo Feldhausen

Abstract

This paper presents an empirical study on the prosody of clitic left-dislocations (CLLDs) in Spanish and offers new perspectives on how the phenomenon of inter-speaker variation in linguistic data can be integrated into formal grammatical theory. Results from a production experiment based on scripted speech show that CLLDs have an obligatory left and right boundary (typically a high edge tone at the intermediate phrase level), while other sentence-internal boundaries are subject to inter-speaker variation. The hypothesis presented here suggests that prosodic boundaries which mark information structural (IS) categories are more necessary than boundaries which satisfy alignment constraints; only the latter can show inter-speaker variation (IS-over-Alignment Hypothesis). A modified version of the Stochastic Optimality Theory (SOT) is proposed to account for the attested inter-speaker variation. By assuming that the degree of constraint overlap can vary between individual speakers while the underlying hierarchy remains invariant, the modified version of SOT is applicable beyond variation in the output structure of a whole population.

  • Aguilar, Lourdes, Carme de la Mota & Pilar Prieto. 2009. Sp_ToBI Training Materials. http://prosodia.upf.edu/sp_tobi/en/ (accessed June, 2014).

  • Astruc, Lluїsa. 2005. The intonation of extra-sentential elements in Catalan and English. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.

  • Avanzi, Mathieu. 2012. L’Interface Prosodie: Syntaxe en Français : Dislocations, Incises et Asyndètes. Bruxelles: Peter Lang.

  • Beas, Omar. 2007. Agreement on the left edge: The syntax of left dislocation in Spanish. California: University of Southern California dissertation.

  • Bocci, Giuliano. 2007. Criterial positions and left periphery in Italian. Nanzan Linguistics 3(1). 35–70.

  • Bocci, Giuliano. 2013. The syntax–prosody interface. A cartographic perspective with evidence from Italian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Boersma, Paul & Bruce Hayes. 2001. Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32(1). 45–86.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2014. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. http://www.praat.org/ (accessed June 2014).

  • Bosque, Ignacio & Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach. 2009. Fundamentos de Sintaxis Formal. Madrid: Akal.

  • Bresnan, Joan, Ashwini Deo & Devyani Sharma. 2007. Typology in variation: a probabilistic approach to be and n‘t in the Survey of English Dialects. English Language and Linguistics 11(2). 301–346.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Butcher, Andrew. 1981. Aspects of the speech pause: Phonetic correlates and communicative functions. AIPUK 15. Kiel: IPdS.

  • Casielles-Suárez, Eugenia. 2003. Left-dislocated structures in Spanish. Hispania 86(2). 326–338.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 1983. ‘Topic’ constructions in some European languages and ‘Connectedness’. In Konrad Ehlich & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Connectedness in sentence, discourse and text, 93–118. Tilburg: KBU.

  • Clifton, Charles, Katy Carlson & Lyn Frazier. 2002. Informative prosodic boundaries. Language and Speech 45(2). 87–114.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Contreras, Helen. 1976. A theory of word order with special reference to Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  • D’Imperio, Mariapaola, Gorka Elordieta, Sónia Frota, Pilar Prieto & Marina Vigário. 2005. Intonational phrasing in Romance. In Sónia Frota, Marina Vigário & Marla J. Freitas (eds.), Prosodies: With special reference to Iberian languages, 59–97. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.

  • Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, Jenny Doetjes & Petra Sleeman. 2004. Dislocations in French. In Francis Corblin & Henriette de Swart (eds.), Handbook of French Semantics, 501–528. Stanford: CSLI.

  • Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth & Ingo Feldhausen. 2014. Variation in prosodic boundary strength in French. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 7. Dublin, 1052–1056.

  • Delattre, Pierre. 1965. Comparing the phonetic features of English, French, German and Spanish. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.

  • Domínguez, Laura. 2004. Mapping focus: The syntax and prosody of focus in Spanish. Boston: Boston University dissertation.

  • Downing, Laura. 2011. The prosody of “dislocation” in selected Bantu languages. Lingua 121(5): 772–786.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Elordieta, Gorka, Sónia Frota & Marina Vigário. 2005. Subjects, objects and intonational phrasing in Spanish and Portuguese. Studia Linguistica 59(2–3). 110–143.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Escudero, David, Lourdes Aguilar, Maria del Mar Vanrell & Pilar Prieto. 2012. Analysis of inter-transcriber consistency in the Cat_ToBI prosodic labelling system. Speech Communication 54(4). 566–582.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva & Pilar Prieto. 2010. Castilian Spanish intonation. In Pilar Prieto & Paolo Roseano, 17–48.

  • Fant, Lars. 1984. Estructura informativa en enspañol: Estudio sintáctico y entonativo. Göteborg: Uppsala.

  • Feldhausen, Ingo. 2010. Sentential form and prosodic structure of Catalan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Feldhausen, Ingo. 2011. The prosodic phrasing of sentential objects. Lingua 121(13). 1934–1964.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Feldhausen, Ingo. 2014a. Intonation and preverbal subjects in Italian. Proceedings of the 10th International Seminar on Speech Production, Köln, 118–121.

  • Feldhausen, Ingo. 2014b. The intonation of left-dislocations in Spanish and other Romance languages. Frankfurt am Main: Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main habilitation thesis.

  • Feldhausen, Ingo. 2016. The relation between prosody and syntax: The case of different types of left-dislocations in Spanish. In Meghan Armstrong, Nicholas Henriksen & Maria del Mar Vanrell (eds.), Intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance, 153–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Feldhausen, Ingo, Christoph Gabriel & Andrea Pešková. 2010. Prosodic phrasing in Argentinean Spanish: Buenos Aires and Neuquén. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 5, Chicago, IL.

  • Féry, Caroline. 2004. Gradient prosodic correlates of phrasing in French. In Trudel Meisenburg & Maria Selig (eds.), Nouveaux départs en phonologie, 161–182. Tübingen: Narr.

  • Féry, Caroline. 2011. German sentence accents and embedded prosodic phrases. Lingua 121(13). 1906–1922.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Féry, Caroline, Robin Hörnig & Serge Pahaut. 2011. Correlates of phrasing in French and German from an experiment with semi-spontaneous speech. In Christoph Gabriel & Conxita Lleó (eds.), Intonational phrasing in Romance and Germanic, 11–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Féry, Caroline & Fabian Schubö. 2011. Hierarchical prosodic structures in the intonation of center-embedded relative clauses. The Linguistic Review 27(3). 293–317.

  • Frascarelli, Mara. 2000. The syntax-phonology interface in focus and topic constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Frazier, Lyn, Katy Carlson & Charles Clifton, JR. 2006. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science 10(6). 244–249.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Frota, Sónia. 2000. Prosody and focus in European Portuguese: Phonological phrasing and intonation. New York, NY: Garland.

  • Frota, Sónia, Mariapaola D’Imperio, Gorka Elordieta, Pilar Prieto & Marina Vigário. 2007. The Phonetics and phonology of intonational phrasing in Romance. In Pilar Prieto, Joan Mascaró & Maria-Josep Solé (eds.), Segmental and prosodic issues in Romance phonology, 131–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Gili Fivela, Barbara. 1999. The prosody of left-dislocated topic constituents in Italian read speech. Proceedings of Eurospeech 6, Budapest, 531–534.

  • Grabe, Esther. 2002. Variation adds to prosodic typology. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 1, Aix-en-Provence, 127–132.

  • Gussenhoven, Carlos & Rietveld, Toni. 1992. Intonation contours, prosodic structure and preboundary lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 20(3). 283–303.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hellmuth, Sam. 2014. Disjunction at prosodic boundaries. Talk presented at Cambridge Linguistics Society, University of Cambridge, 30th October 2014.

  • Hualde, José I. 2002. Intonation in Spanish and the other Ibero-Romance languages: Overview and status quaestionis. In Carolin Wiltshire & Joaquim Camps (eds.), Romance phonology and variation, 101–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Hualde, José I. 2005. The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hualde, José I. & Pilar Prieto. 2015. Intonational variation in Spanish: European and American varieties. In Sónia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds.), Intonational variation in Romance, 350–391. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.). 2014. Prosodic typlogy II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kirchner, Robert. 2002. Preliminary thoughts on “phonologisation” within an exemplar-based speech processing model. UCLA Working Papers 6.

  • Ladd, Robert. 1988. Declination ‘reset’ and the hierarchical organization of utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84(2). 530–544.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Ladd, Robert. 2008. Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • López, Luis. 2009. A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • López-Cortina, Jorge. 2007. The Spanish left periphery: Questions and answers. Washington, DC: Georgetown University dissertation.

  • McCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1993. Generalized alignment. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1993, 79–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Myrberg, Sara. 2013. Sisterhood in prosodic branching. Phonology 30(1). 73–124.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Niebuhr, Oliver, Mariapaola D’Imperio, Barbara Gili Fivela & Francesco Cangemi. 2011. Are there “shapers” and “aligners”? Individual differences in signalling pitch accent category. Proceedings of the 17th ICPhS, Hong Kong, 120–123.

  • Patin, Cédric, Ingo Feldhausen & Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie. Structure prosodique et dislocation à gauche dans les langues romanes et bantu: vers une approche typologique unifiée en OT. In Éva Buchi, Jean-Paul Chauveau & Jean-Marie Pierrel (eds.). Actes du XXVIIe Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes. Strasbourg: Société de linguistique. https://www.academia.edu/5495293/Structure_prosodique_et_dislocation_%C3%A0_gauche_dans_les_langues_romanes_et_bantu_engl._Prosodic_Structure_and_Clitic_Left-Dislocations_in_Romance_and_Bantu_Languages_

  • Pešková, Andrea. 2015. Sujetos pronominales en el español porteño: Implicaciones pragmáticas en la interfaz sintáctico-fonológica. Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • Peters, Benno, Klaus Kohler & Thomas Wesener. 2005. Phonetische Merkmale prosodischer Phrasierung in deutscher Spontansprache. In Klaus Kohler, Felicitas Kleber & Benno Peters (eds.), Prosodic structures in German spontaneous speech, 143–184. Kiel: IPdS.

  • Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.

  • Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. Stochastic phonology. Glot International 5(6). 195–207.

  • Pitrelli, John F. Mary E. Beckman & Julia Hirschberg. 1994. Evaluation of prosodic transcription labeling reliability in the ToBI framework. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Yokohama, 123–126.

  • Post, Brechtje. 2000. Tonal and phrasal structures in French intonation. The Hague: Thesus.

  • Price, Patti, Mari Ostendorf, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Cynthia Fong. 1991. The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90(6). 2956–2970.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Prieto, Pilar. 2006. Phonological phrasing in Spanish. In Sonia Colina & Fernando Martínez-Gil (eds.), Optimality-theoretic advances in Spanish phonology, 39–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Prieto, Pilar & Paolo Roseano (eds.). 2010. Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language. München: Lincom.

  • Prieto, Pilar, Maria del Mar Vanrell, Lluїsa Astruc, Elinor Payne & Brechtje Post. 2012. Phonotactic and phrasal properties of speech rhythm. Speech Communication 54(6). 681–702.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar (Technical Report Nr. 2). Rutgers University [Published 2004 by Blackwell, Oxford].

  • Rao, Rajiv. 2008. Observations on the roles of prosody and syntax in the phonological phrasing of Barcelona Spanish. The Linguistics Journal 3(3). 85–131.

  • Rivero, María-Luisa. 1980. On left-dislocation and topicalization in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 11(2). 363–393.

  • Rossi, Mario. 1999. L‘Intonation, le Système du Français - Description et Modélisation. Paris: Ophrys.

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1995. The prosodic structure of function words. In James Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds.), Signal to syntax, 187–214. Mahwah, NJ: L.E. Associates.

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn, 435–484. Oxford: Blackwell.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1984. Topicalización y Pragmática en Español. Revista Española de Lingüística 14(1). 1–20.

  • Suñer, Margarita. 2006. Left dislocations with and without epithets. Probus 18(1). 127–158.

  • Trouvain, Jürgen. 2004. Tempo variation in speech production: Implications for speech synthesis. Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes dissertation.

  • Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30(2). 219–255.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2002. Upstep and embedded register levels. Phonology 19(1). 77–120.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Vaissière, Jacqueline. 1983. Language-independent prosodic features. In Anne Cutler & Robert D. Ladd (eds.), Prosody: Models and measurements, 53–65. Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Villalba, Xavier. 2009. The syntax and semantics of dislocations in Catalan. Köln: Lambert Academic Publishing.

  • Vizcaíno Ortega, Francisco, Mercedes Cabrera Abreu, Eva Estebas-Vilaplana & Lluїsa Astruc. 2008. The phonological representation of edge tones in Spanish alternative questions. Language Design 56(2). 31–38.

  • Wightman, Colin, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, Mari Ostendorf & Patti Price. 1992. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91(3). 1707–1717.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Yoon, Tae-Jin, Jennifer Cole & Mark Hasegawa-Johnson. 2007. On the edge: acoustic cues to layered prosodic domains. Proceedings of the 16th ICPhS, Saarbrücken, 1264–1267.

  • Zubizarreta, Maria L. 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Probus is a platform for the discussion of historical and synchronic research in the field of Latin and Romance linguistics, with special emphasis on phonology, morphology, syntax, language acquisition and sociolinguistics. The journal encourages problem-oriented contributions that combine the solid empirical foundations of philological and linguistic work with the insights provided by modern theoretical approaches.

Search