Naturalism about the mind is typically associated with some kind of physicalism. This paper argues that this association is a mistake and that, given the naturalist’s commitment to the primacy of empirical evidence, naturalists should be open to different commitments. It is further argued that naturalists about the mind should be emergentists because of the epistemological attitude that is at the core of the emergentist position, properly understood.
This journal promotes current debates in all philosophical topics, historically and systematically. The aim of SATS is that each paper not only adds to these discussions but helps scholars who are not specialists in the specific fields to understand and assess the content of the debates. Thus each paper is reviewed by an ad hoc international expert on the given subject and by an editorial board member.