Palast der Republik, by the photographer Christoph Rokitta, is an independent photobook published in 2013 in Berlin. In the photobook different semiotic resources are coupled in order to iconically model the demolition of the homonymous building in Berlin. In opposition to the trivial notion of icon as sign that stands for its object in a relation of similarity, we analyze the photobook as an icon whose main feature is the possibility of discovering information about its object through its manipulation. This specific feature is called operational criterion for iconicity, and it stresses the inherent quality of icons of revealing information available through their manipulation and observation. Our aim is to describe and analyze the relations between semiotic resources in this photobook by exploring the operational criterion of iconicity, and models as epistemic artifacts. We are interested in how couplings between semiotic resources in the photobook can iconically model a spatio-temporal process.
Achinstein, Peter. 1965. Theoretical models. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16(62) 102–120.
Ambrosio, Chiara. 2010. Iconicity as homomorphism: The case of Picasso’s Guernica. In: M. Bergman, S. Paavola, A.-V. Pietarinen and H. Rydenfelteds, Ideas in action: Proceedings of the applying Peirce conference (Nordic Studies in Pragmatism 1), 151–162. Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network.
Atkin, Albert. 2005. Peirce on the index and indexical reference. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 41(1) 161–188.
Bokulich, Alisa. 2011. How scientific models can explain. Synthese 180(1) 33–45.
Chevalier, Jean-Marie. 2015. The problem of resemblance in Peirce’s semiotics and philosophy. Versus 120. 45–59.
Downes, Stephen M. 1992. The importance of models in theorizing: A deflationary semantic view. PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association 1. 142–153.
Frigg, Roman. 2002. Models and representation: Why structures are not enough. In: Measurement in physics and economics discussion paper series, 1–42. London: London School of Economics.
Giere, Ronald N. 1988. Explaining science. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Giere, Ronald N. 2004. How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science 71(5) 742–752.
Harré, Rom & Daniel Rothbart. 2004. Modeling: Gateway to the unknown Vol. 1: Gulf. New York: Elsevier Science.
Hoffmann, Michael H.G. 2005. Signs as means for discoveries. In: M. H. G. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard and F. Seeger (Eds.), Activity and sign: Grounding mathematics education, 45–56. New York: Springer.
Hookway, Christopher. 2002. Truth, rationality, and pragmatism: Themes from Peirce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johansen, Jorgen D. 1993. Dialogic semiosis. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Knuuttila, Tarja. 2005. Models as epistemic artefacts. Helskinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Philosophy.
Knuuttila, Tarja & Mieke Boon. 2011. How do models give us knowledge? The case of Carnot’s ideal heat engine. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1(3) 309–334.
Knuuttila, Tarja & Atro Voutilainen. 2003. A parser as an epistemic artefact: A material view on models. Philosophy of Science 70. 1484–1495.
Kralemann, Björn & Claas Lattmann. 2013. Models as icons: Modeling models in the semiotic framework of Peirce’s theory of signs. Synthese 190(6) 3397–3420.
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, Vol. 8 : C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss and A. W. Burkseds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.].
Peirce, Charles S. 1967. Manuscripts in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified by Richard Robin, Annotated catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. [Reference to Peirce’s manuscripts will be designated MS or L.]
Peirce, Charles S. 1982. Writings of Charles S. Peirce, Vol. 6 : M. Fisch, E. Moore and C. Kloeseleds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s writings will be designated W followed by volume and page number.].
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913). Peirce Edition Projecteds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.].
Pravica, David W. & Michael J. Spurr. 2011. Mathematical modeling for the scientific method. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
Queiroz, João & Charbel Nino El-Hani. 2012. Downward determination in semiotic multi-level systems. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 19. 123–136.
Rokkita, Christoph. 2013. Palast der Republik. Berlin.
Salthe, Stanley N. 2009. A hierarchical framework for levels of reality: Understanding through representation. Axiomathes 19(1) 87–99.
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2000. Diagrams as centerpiece of a Peircean epistemology. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 36(3) 357–384.
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2007. Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology and semiotics. New York: Springer.
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2011. On operational and optimal iconicity in Peirce’s diagrammatology. Semiotica 186(1/4) 395–419.
Suppe, Frederick. 1989. The semantic conception of theories and scientific realism. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Suppe, Frederik. 1974. Theories and phenomena. In: W. Leinfellner and E. Köhler (eds.), Developments in the methodology of social science, 45–91. Dordrecht: Springer.
Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1980. The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1989. Laws and symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The official journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, founded in 1969 as one of the first scholarly journals in the field, Semiotica features articles reporting results of research in all branches of semiotic studies, in-depth reviews of selected current literature in the field, and occasional guest editorials and reports. The journal also publishes occasional Special Issues devoted to topics of particular interest.