Bils and Kahn [Bils, M., and J. A. Kahn. 2000. “What Inventory Behavior Tells us about Business Cycles.” American Economic Review 90, 458–481.] conjectured that a competitive technology-driven business cycle model could not generate countercyclical inventory-sales ratios. Khan and Thomas [Khan, A., and J. Thomas. 2007a. “Explaining Inventories: A Business Cycle Assessment of the Stockout Avoidance and (s,s) Motives.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 11(5): 638–664. Khan, A., and J. K. Thomas. 2007b. “Inventories and the Business Cycle: An Equilibrium Analysis of (s,s) Policies.” American Economic Review 94(4): 1165–1188.] developed a model that disproved this conjecture. However, as this paper shows, that model underperforms a baseline model without inventories for many important moments. However, when variable utilization is added to the model, many of these moments perform better in the full model than in the baseline. The results suggest important interactions between variable utilization and inventory dynamics.
Altig, D., L. J. Christiano, M. Eichenbaum, and J. Linde. 2011. “Firm-Specific Capital, Nominal Rigidities, and the Business Cycle.” Review of Economic Dynamics 14 (2): 225–247.
Basu, S. 1996. “Procyclical Productivity: Increasing Returns or Cyclical Utilization?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (3): 719–751.
Basu, S., and M. S. Kimball. 1997. “Cyclical Productivity with Unobserved Input Variation.” NBER Working Paper 5915.
Bils, M., and J. A. Kahn. 2000. “What Inventory Behavior Tells us about Business Cycles.” American Economic Review 90: 458–481.
Bresnahan, T. F., and V. A. Ramey. 1993. “Segment Shifts and Capacity Utilization in the U.S. Automobile Industry.” The American Economic Review 83 (2): 213–218.
Bresnahan, T. F., and V. A. Ramey. 1994. “Output Fluctuations at the Plant Level.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (3): 593–624.
Christiano, L., M. Eichenbaum, and C. L. Evans. 2005. “Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy.” The Journal of Political Economy 113 (1): 1–45.
Dale, W. Jorgenson, F. G., and B. M. Fraumeni. 1999. Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth. New York: toExcel.
Hornstein, A. 2002. “Towards a Theory of Capacity Utilization: Shiftwork and the Workweek of Capital.” Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly 88 (2): 65–86.
Jaimovich, N., and S. Rebelo. 2009. “Can News about the Future Drive the Business Cycle?” American Economic Review 99 (4): 1097–1118
Justiniano, A., and G. E. Primiceri. 2008. “The Time-Varying Volatility of Macroeconomic fluctuations.” American Economic Review 98 (3): 604–641.
Khan, A., and J. Thomas. 2007a. “Explaining Inventories: A Business Cycle Assessment of the Stockout Avoidance and (s,s) Motives.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 11 (5): 638–664.
Khan, A., and J. K. Thomas. 2007b. “Inventories and the Business Cycle: An Equilibrium Analysis of (s,s) Policies.” American Economic Review 94 (4): 1165–1188.
King, R. G., and S. T. Rebelo. 1999. “Resuscitating Real Business Cycles.” In: Handbook of Macroeconomics, edited by J. B. Taylor and M. Woodford, Vol. 1b, 927–1007. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, North-Holland.
Krusell, P., and A. Smith Jr. 1997a. “Income and Wealth Heterogeneity in the Macroeconomy.”Journal of Political Economy 106: 867–896.
Krusell, P., and A. Smith Jr. 1997b. “Income and Wealth Heterogeneity, Portfolio Choice, and Equilibrium Asset Returns.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 1: 387–422.
Kydland, F. E., and E. C. Prescott. 1991. “Hours and Employment Variation in Business Cycle Theory.” Economic Theory 1 (1): 63–81.
Lucas, Jr., R. E. 1970. “Capacity, Overtime, and Empirical Production Functions.” The American Economic Review 60 (2): 23–27.
Mattey, J., and S. Strongin. 1997. “Factor Utilization and Margins for Adjusting Output: Evidence from Manufacturing Plants.” Economic Review 2: 3–17.
Prescott, E. C. 1986. “Theory Ahead of Business Cycle Measurement.” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 10 (4): 9–22.
Ramey, V. A., and K. D. West. 1999. “Inventories.” In: Handbook of Macroeconomics, edited by J. B. Taylor and M. Woodford, Vol. 1b, 863–923. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, North-Holland.
Rogerson, R. 1988. “Indivisible Labor, Lotteries, and Equilibrium.” Journal of Monetary Economics 21 (1): 3–16.
Shapiro, M. D. 1993. “Cyclical Productivity and The Workweek of Capital.” The American Economic Review 83 (2): 229–233.
Shapiro, M. D., R. J. Gordon, and L. H. Summers. 1989. “Assessing the Federal Reserve’s Measures of Capacity and Utilitization.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1989 (1): 181–241.
Shapiro, M. D., C. Corrado, and P. K. Clark. 1996. “Macroeconomic Implications of Variation in The Workweek of Capital.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1996: 79–133.
Smith, K. R. 1970. “Risk and the Optimal Utilization of Capital.” The Review of Economic Studies 37 (2): 253–259.
Tauchen, G. 1987. “Finite State Markov-Chain Approximations to Univariate and Vector Autoregressions.” Economics Letters 20 (2): 177–181.
Trupkin, D. 2008. Inventories and Capacity Utilization in General Equilibrium. Ph. D.thesis, Texas A&M University.
Wang, P., and Y. Wen. 2009. “Inventory Accelerator in General Equilibrium.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper 2009-010A.
Wang, P., Y. Wen, and Z. Xu. 2011. “When do Inventories Destabilize the Economy? an Analytical Approach to (s,s) Policies.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper 2011-014A.
Wen, Y. 2008. “Inventories, Liquidity, and the Macroeconomy.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper 2008-045A.
Wen, Y. 2011. “Input and Output Inventory Dynamics.” American Economics Journal: Macroeconomics 3 (4): 181–212.
Corresponding author: Lucas M. Engelhardt, Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Kent State University, Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720, USA, Phone: +330-244-3307, e-mail:
SNDE recognizes that advances in statistics and dynamical systems theory can increase our understanding of economic and financial markets. The journal seeks both theoretical and applied papers that characterize and motivate nonlinear phenomena. Researchers are required to assist replication of empirical results by providing copies of data and programs online. Algorithms and rapid communications are also published.