Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu

  • 1 Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, PO Box 310, 6500 AH, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Mark Dingemanse
  • Corresponding author
  • Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, PO Box 310, 6500 AH, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar


Ideophones are often described as words that are highly expressive and morphosyntactically marginal. A study of ideophones in everyday conversations in Siwu (Kwa, eastern Ghana) reveals a landscape of variation and change that sheds light on some larger questions in the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones. This article documents a trade-off between expressiveness and morphosyntactic integration, with high expressiveness linked to low integration and vice versa. It also describes a pathway for deideophonization and finds that frequency of use influences the degree to which ideophones can come to be more like ordinary words. The findings have implications for processes of (de)ideophonization, ideophone borrowing, and ideophone typology. A key point is that the internal diversity we find in naturally occurring data, far from being mere noise, is patterned variation that can help us to get a handle on the factors shaping ideophone systems within and across languages.

  • Akita, Kimi. 2009. A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: Theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of Japanese mimetics. PhD dissertation, Kobe University.

  • Akita, Kimi. 2012. Toward a frame-semantic definition of sound-symbolic words: A collocational analysis of Japanese mimetics. Cognitive Linguistics 23(1). 67–90.

  • Alpher, Barry. 2001. Ideophones in interaction with intonation and the expression of new information in some indigenous languages of Australia. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 9–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Bartens, Angela. 2000. Ideophones and sound symbolism in Atlantic Creoles. Saarijärvi: Gummerus Printing.

  • Blench, Roger. 2010. The sensory world: Ideophones in Africa and elsewhere. In Anne Storch (ed.), Perception of the invisible: Religion, historical semantics and the role of perceptive verbs, 275–296. Cologne: Köppe.

  • Bodomo, Adams B. 2006. The structure of ideophones in African and Asian languages: The case of Dagaare and Cantonese. In John M. Mugane, John P. Hutchison & Dee A. Worman (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: African Languages and Linguistics in Broad Perspectives, 203–213. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

  • Bybee, Joan L. 2007. Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Childs, G. Tucker. 1988. The phonology and morphology of Kisi. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Childs, G. Tucker. 1994a. African Ideophones. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 178–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Childs, G. Tucker. 1994b. Expressiveness in contact situations: The fate of African ideophones. Journal of Pidgin and Creole languages 9(2). 257–282.

  • De Sousa, Hilário. 2011. Ideophonic compounds in East and Southeast Asia, presented at the Association for Linguistic Typology 9th Biennial Conference, Hong Kong.

  • Dhoorre, Cabdulqaadir Salaad & Mauro Tosco. 1998. 111 Somali ideophones. Journal of African Cultural Studies 11(2). 125–156.

  • Diffloth, Gérard. 1972. Notes on expressive meaning. Chicago Linguistic Society 8. 440–447.

  • Diffloth, Gérard. 1976. Expressives in Semai. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications (13). 249–264.

  • Dingemanse, Mark. 2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(10). 654–672.

  • Dingemanse, Mark. 2015. Ideophones and reduplication: Depiction, description, and the interpretation of repeated talk in discourse. Studies in Language 39(4). 946–970.

  • Dingemanse, Mark & Simeon Floyd. 2014. Conversation across cultures. In Nick J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman & Jack Sidnell (eds.), Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, 434–464. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dwyer, David & Lioba Moshi. 2003. Primary and grammaticalized ideophones. In John M. Mugane (ed.), Linguistic typology and representation of African languages, 173–185. Trenton: Africa World Press.

  • Emeneau, Murray B. 1969. Onomatopoetics in the Indian linguistic area. Language 45(2).274–299.

  • Enfield, Nick J. 2008. Transmission biases in linguistic epidemiology. Journal of Language Contact 2. 299–310.

  • Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins. 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3). 546–592.

  • Ford, Kevin. 1988. Structural features of the Central Togo languages. In Mary Esther & Kropp Dakubu (ed.), The languages of Ghana, 126–154. London: Kegan Paul.

  • Gomi, Taro. 1989. An illustrated dictionary of Japanese onomatopoeic expressions. Transl. by J. Turrent. Tokyo: Japan Times.

  • Güldemann, Tom. 2008. Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687.

  • Johnson, Marion M. 1976. Toward a definition of the ideophone in Bantu. Working Papers in Linguistics 21. 240–253.

  • Kilian-Hatz, Christa. 1999. Ideophone: Eine typologische Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung afrikanischer Sprachen. Habilitationsschrift, Universität zu Köln.

  • Kilian-Hatz, Christa. 2001. Universality and diversity: Ideophones from Baka and Kxoe. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 155–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Kilian-Hatz, Christa. 2006. Ideophones. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, 508–512. Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Kita, Sotaro. 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35. 379–415.

  • Kossmann, Maarten. in press. Sub-Saharan influence on Tuareg morphology: The case of full reduplication. In [Festschrift], edited by Rainer Vossen.

  • Kruspe, Nicole. 2004. A grammar of Semelai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kunene, Daniel P. 1965. The ideophone in Southern Sotho. Journal of African Languages 4. 19–39.

  • Le Guen, Olivier. 2012. Ideophones in Yucatec Maya. In Proceedings of the SSILA V Conference, 26. Austin, TX.

  • Liberman, Mark. 1975. The intonational system of English. PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Matras, Yaron. 2007. The borrowability of structural categories. In Yaron Matras & Jeannette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 31–73. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1945. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.

  • Mtintsilana, Priscilla N. & Rose Morris. 1988. Terminography in African languages in South Africa. South African Journal of African Languages 8(4). 109–113.

  • Nakagawa, Hirosi. 2011. A first report on G|Ui ideophones. In Osamu Hieda, Christa König & Hirosi Nakagawa (eds.), Geographical typology and linguistic areas: With special reference to Africa, 279–286. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Newman, Paul. 1968. Ideophones from a syntactic point of view. Journal of West AfricanLanguages 5. 107–117.

  • Newman, Paul. 2001. Are ideophones really as weird and extra-systematic as linguists make them out to be? In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 251–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Nuckolls, Janis B. 1996. Sounds like life: Sound-symbolic grammar, performance, andcognition in Pastaza Quechua. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Nuckolls, Janis B. 2004. To be or to be not ideophonically impoverished. In Wai Fong Chiang, Elaine Chun, Laura Mahalingappa & Siri Mehus (eds.), SALSA XI: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium about Language and Society, 131–142. Austin: University of Texas.

  • Samarin, William J. 1970. Inventory and choice in expressive language. Word 26. 153–169.

  • Selting, Margret. 1994. Emphatic speech style – with special focus on the prosodic signalling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 22(3/4). 375–408.

  • Shintel, Hadas, Howard C. Nusbaum & Arika Okrent. 2006. Analog acoustic expression in speech communication. Journal of Memory and Language 55(2). 167–177.

  • Storch, Anne & Rainer Vossen. 2007. Odours and colours in Nilotic: Comparative case studies. In Mechthild Reh & Doris L. Payne (eds.), Advances in Nilo-Saharan linguistics, proceedings of the 8th Nilo-Saharan Linguistics Colloquium, 101–121. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.

  • Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Kilian-Hatz, Christa (eds.) 2001. Ideophones. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Zipf, George K. 1935. The psycho-biology of language. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  • Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1987. Plain morphology and expressive morphology. In John Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis & Hana Filip (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, VII. 330–340. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.

Journal + Issues

STUF is a forum for scholarly articles in the realm of linguistic typology and universals research. The journal covers original empirical as well as theoretical studies of the structural diversity and/or of the invariants of human language(s). Contributions in the areas of areal typology and diachronic typology are also welcome.