Pandora’s Box Opened

  • 1 Faculty of Linguistics & Literary Studies, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
  • 2 School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK
Hannes Rieser and Massimo Poesio

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Fernández, Raquel, Jonathan Ginzburg & Shalom Lappin. 2007. Classifying non-sentential utterances in dialogue: A machine learning approach. Computational Linguistics 33(3). 397–427.

  • Gregoromichelaki, E., Cann R. & Kempson, R. 2013a. Coordination in dialogue: subsentential speech and its implications. In L. Goldstein (ed.), Brevity, 53–73. Oxford University Press.

  • Hendriks, Petra. 2013. Asymmetries between language production and comprehension. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Kallmeyer, Laura & Aravind Joshi. 2003. Factoring predicate argument and scope semantics: Underspecified semantics with LTAG. Research on Language and Computation 1(1–2). 3–58.

  • Muskens, Reinhard. 1996. Combining Montague semantics and discourse representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 19. 143–186.

  • Poesio, M. & Traum, D. 1997. Conversational actions and discourse situations. Computational Intelligence 13(3). 309–347.

  • Poesio, M. & H. Rieser. 2010. Completions, co-ordination and alignment in dialogue. Dialogue and Discourse 1. 1–89.

  • Recanati, François. 1993. Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Recanati, François. 2007. Perspectival thought. Oxford: OUP.

  • Sturt, Patrick & Matthew W. Crocker. 1996. Monotonic syntactic processing: A cross-linguistic study of attachment and reanalysis. Language and Cognitive Processes 11(5). 449–494.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


Journal + Issues

Theoretical Linguistics is an open peer review journal. Each issue contains one long target article about a topic of general linguistic interest, together with several shorter reactions, comments and reflections on it. With this format, the journal aims to stimulate discussion in linguistics and adjacent fields of study, in particular across schools of different theoretical orientations.

Search