If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Austin, John. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barwise, Jon & John Perry. 1983. Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Clark, Herbert. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cooper, Robin. 2014a. How to do things with types. In V. de Paiva et al, (eds.), Joint proceedings of the second workshop on Natural Language and Computer Science (NLCS 2014) & 1st international workshop on Natural Language Services for Reasoners (NLSR 2014) July 17–18, 2014 Vienna, Austria, 149–158, Center for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra.
Cooper, Robin. 2014b. Phrase structure rules as dialogue update rules. In V. Rieser & P. Muller (eds.), Proceedings of The 18th workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue, 26–34.
Eshghi, Arash, Matthew Purver & Julian Hough. 2011. Dylan: Parser For dynamic syntax, Technical report. Queen Mary University of London.
Eshghi, Arash, Matthew Purver & Julian Hough. 2013 Probabilistic induction for an incremental semantic grammar. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2013) – Long Papers, 107–118, Potsdam, Germany: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Ginzburg, Jonathan. 2012. The interactive stance: Meaning for conversation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ginzburg, Jonathan, Robin Cooper, Julian Hough & David Schlangen. 2016. Incrementality and Clarification/Sluicing potential. Paper presented at Sinn und Bedeutung, Edinburgh.
Ginzburg, Jonathan & Massimo Poesio. 2016. Grammar is a system that characterizes talk in interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 7. 1938.
Hough, Julian. 2015. Modelling incremental self-repair processing in dialogue. Queen Mary University of London PhD dissertation.
Jurafsky, Daniel & James H. Martin. 2009. Speech and language processing, 2nd edn. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Education.
Kalatzis, Dimitrios, Arash Eshghi & Oliver Lemon. 2016. Bootstrapping incremental dialogue systems: Using linguistic knowledge to learn from minimal data. In Proceedings of the NIPS 2016 workshop on Learning Methods for Dialogue, Barcelona.
Kaplan, Ronald M. 1973. A general syntactic processor. In R. Rustin (ed.), Natural language processing, 193–241. New York: Algorithmics Press.
Kay, Martin. 1982. Algorithm schemata and data structures in syntactic processing. In S. Allén (ed.), Text processing: Text analysis and generation, text typology and attribution, 327–358. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Larsson, Staffan. 2002. Issue-based dialogue management. University of Gothenburg PhD dissertation.
Larsson, Staffan & David R. Traum. 2001. Information state and dialogue management in the TRINDI dialogue move engine toolkit. Natural Language Engineering 6(3&4). 323–340.
Lewis, David. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8. 339–359.
Montague, Richard. 1973. The proper treatment of quantification in Ordinary English, J. Hintikka et al. (eds.), Approaches to natural, 247–270. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Pereira, Fernando C. N. & Stuart M. Shieber. 1987. Prolog and natural-language analysis, CSLI Lecture Notes 10. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Pereira, Fernando C. N. & David H. D. Warren. 1983. Parsing as deduction. ACL '83 Proceedings of the 21st annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, 137–144.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50. 696–735.
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woods, William A. 1970. Transition network grammars for natural language analysis. Communications of the ACM 13. 591–606.
Theoretical Linguistics is an open peer review journal. Each issue contains one long target article about a topic of general linguistic interest, together with several shorter reactions, comments and reflections on it. With this format, the journal aims to stimulate discussion in linguistics and adjacent fields of study, in particular across schools of different theoretical orientations.