Action-Based Grammar

Ruth Kempson 1 , Ronnie Cann 2 , Eleni Gregoromichelaki 1 , 3  and Stergios Chatzikyriakidis 4 , 5
  • 1 Department of Philosophy, Strand, London, UK
  • 2 Department of Linguistics and English Language, Old College, South Bridge, UK
  • 3 Institute of Cognitive Science, 49074 Osnabrück, Neuer Graben, Germany
  • 4 Department of Philosophy, Linguistics, Theory of Science, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • 5 Open University of Cyprus, B1 33, Latsia, Cyprus
Ruth Kempson, Ronnie Cann
  • Department of Linguistics and English Language, University of Edinburgh, Old College, South Bridge, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar
, Eleni Gregoromichelaki
  • Department of Philosophy, King's College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, UK
  • Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Neuer Graben, 49074 Osnabrück, Germany
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar
and Stergios Chatzikyriakidis
  • Department of Philosophy, Linguistics, Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Open University of Cyprus, B1 33, Latsia, 2220, Cyprus
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anderson, John 1990. Cognitive psychology and its implications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

  • Barton, Ellen 1991. Nonsentential constituents and theories of phrase structure. In K. Leffel & D. Bouchard (eds.), Views on phrase structure, 193–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Bickhard, Mark H. 1993. Representational content in humans and machines. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(4). 285–333.

  • Bickhard, Mark H. 2009. The interactivist model. Synthese 166. 547591.

  • Bouzouita, Miriam. 2008. Clitic placement in the history of Spanish. London: King’s College, Ph.D. thesis, 22.

  • Cann, Ronnie. 2011. Towards an account of the English auxiliary system. In R. Kempson, E. Gregoromichelaki & C. Howes (eds.), The dynamics of lexical interfaces, 279–317. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Cann, Ronnie, Ruth Kempson & Lutz Marten. 2005. The dynamics of language. Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Cann, Ronnie & Wu Yicheng. 2011. The bei construction in Chinese. In R. Kempson, E. Gregoromichelaki & C. Howes (eds.), The dynamics of lexical interfaces, 239–378. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Cann, Ronnie, Ruth Kempson & Daniel Wedgwood. 2012. Representialism and linguistic knowledge. In R. Kempson, T. Fernando & N. Asher (eds.), Philosophy of linguistics: Handbook of the philosophy of science 14, 357–401. Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Chatzikyriakidis, Stergios. 2010. Clitics in four dialects of Modern Greek: A dynamic account. London: King’s College, Ph.D. thesis.

  • Chatzikyriakidis, Stergios. 2012. A dynamic account of the Cypriot Greek clitic positioning system. Lingua 122. 642–672.

  • Chatzikyriakidis, Stergios. 2017. Afterthoughts in Greek: Gender mismatches under a dynamic framework. Journal of Linguistics 53(2). 279–325.

  • Christiansen, Morton & Nick Chater. 2016. Creating language: Integrating evolution, acquisition and processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Clark, Andy. 2013. Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Brain and Behavioral Science 36. 181–204.

  • Clark, Andy. 2016. Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action and the embodied mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Clark, Eve. 2009. Language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Clark, Eve & Marisa Casillas. 2016. First language acquisition. In K. Allan (ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics, 311–329. New York: Routledge.

  • Clark, Herbert. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Cooper, Robin. 2012. Type theory and semantics in flux. in R. Kempson, T. Fernando & N. Asher (eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Cooper, Robin. 2014. Phrase structure rules as dialogue update rules. In V. Rieser & P. Muller (eds.), Proceedings of the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue (SEMDIAL), vol. 18, 26–34. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

  • Cooper, Robin. 2017. Adapting type theory with records for natural language semantics. In S. Chatzikyriakidis & Z. Luo (eds.), Modern perspectives in type-theoretical semantics, 71–94 Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Cooper, Robin. in prep. Type theory and language: From perception to linguistic communication. Draft of book chapters. https://sites.google.com/site/typetheorywithrecords/drafts.

  • De Groote, Philippe 2001. Towards abstract categorial grammars. Proceedings of Association for Computational Linguistics, 39th Annual Meeting and 10th Conference of the European Chapter. 148–155.

  • Demberg-Winterfors, Vera. 2010. Broad-coverage model of prediction in human sentence processing. The University of Edinburgh, Ph.D. Thesis.

  • Eshghi, Arash, Christine Howes, Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Julian Hough & Matthew Purver. 2015. Feedback in conversation as incremental semantic update. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS). London.

  • Eshghi, Arash, Matthew Purver & Julian Hough. 2011. DyLan: Parser for dynamic syntax. Technical Report, Queen Mary, University of London.

  • Eshghi, Arash, Matthew Purver, Julian Hough & Yo Sato. 2013. Probabilistic grammar induction in an incremental semantic framework. In D. Duchier & Y. Parmentier (eds.), CSLP lecture notes in computer science 8114, 92–107. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

  • Friston, Karl & Christopher Frith. 2015. A duet for one. Consciousness and Cognition 36. 390–405.

  • Frith, Christopher. 2007. Making up the mind: How the brain creates our mental world. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Gärdenfors, Peter. 2014. The geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Gargett, Andrew, Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Christine Howes & Yo Sato. 2008. Dialogue-grammar correspondence in dynamic syntax. Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. (LONDIAL’08).

  • Gibson, Hannah. 2015. The dynamics of structure building in Rangi: At the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 8. 41–55.

  • Ginzburg, Jonathan. 2012. The interactive stance: Meaning for conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ginzburg, Jonathan & Massimo Poesio. 2016. Grammar is a system that characterizes talk in interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, Section Language Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01938

  • Ginzburg, Jonathan & Robin Cooper. 2004. Clarification, ellipsis and the nature of contextual updates in dialogue. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(3). 297–365.

  • Ginzburg, Jonathan & Robin Cooper. 2014. Quotation via dialogical interaction. Journal of Logic, Linguistics and Information 23. 287–311.

  • Ginzburg, Jonathan, Raquel Fernández & David Schlangen. 2014. Disfluencies as intra-utterance dialogue moves. Semantics and Pragmatics 7(9). 1–64.

  • Goodwin, Charles. 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In George Psathas (ed.) Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.

  • Graf, Thomas. 2013. Local and transderivational constraints in syntax and semantics. University of California, PhD Thesis.

  • Gregoromichelaki, Eleni. 2013a. Grammar as action in language and music. In M. Orwin, C. Howes & R. Kempson (eds.), Language, music and interaction. London: College Publications.

  • Gregoromichelaki, Eleni. 2013b. Clitic left dislocation and clitic doubling: A dynamic perspective on left-right asymmetries in Greek. In G. Webelhuth, M. Sailer & H. Walker (eds.), Rightward movement in a comparative perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Gregoromichelaki, Eleni. 2016. Grammars as mechanisms for fine-grained situated conceptualisation. Talk presented at the ‘Word Meaning Workshop’ University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz, November 2016.

  • Gregoromichelaki, Eleni. 2017. The case of non-sentential speech acts. Ms University of Osnabrueck.

  • Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, in press. Quotation in dialogue. In P. Saka & M. Johnson (eds.), The pragmatics of quotation. Springer.

  • Gregoromichelaki, Eleni & Ruth Kempson. 2015. Joint utterances and the (split-)turn taking puzzle. In J. L. Mey & A. Capone (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society. Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, Ruth Kempson, Christine Howes, Arash Eshghi. 2013. On making syntax dynamic: The challenge of compound utterances and the architecture of the grammar. In I. Wachsmuth, J. de Ruiter, P. Jaeck & S. Kopp (eds.), Alignment in communication: Towards a new theory of communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, Ruth Kempson, Matthew Purver, Gregory Mills, Ronnie Cann, Wilfried Meyer-Viol & Patrick G. T. Healey. 2011. Incrementality and intention-recognition in utterance processing. Dialogue and Discourse 2(1). 199–233.

  • Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, Yo Sato, Ruth Kempson, Andrew Gargett & Christine Howes. 2009. Dialogue modelling and the remit of core grammar. Proceedings of IWCS 2009.

  • Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics, 3(S41). 58.

  • Guhe, Markus. 2007. Incremental conceptualization for language production. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Hale, John. 2006. Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence. Cognitive Science 30. 643672.

  • Healey, Patrick. 2008. Interactive misalignment: The role of repair in the development of group sub-languages. In R. Cooper & R. Kempson (eds.), Language in flux: Language coordination, language variation, change and evolution. London: College Publications.

  • Healey, Patrick, Matthew Purver & Christine Howes. 2014. Divergence in dialogue. PLoS One 9(2). . http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/7078

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Healey, Patrick G.T. 1997. Expertise or expert-ese? The emergence of task-oriented sub-languages. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

  • Hendriks, Petra. 2014. Asymmetries between language production and comprehension. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Hilbrink, Elma, Herideth Gattis & Stephen Levinson. 2015. Early developmental changes in the timing of turn-taking: A longitudinal study of mother-infant interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 1492. doi: .

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Honing, Henkjan & Willem Zuidema. 2014. Decomposing dendrophilia. Comment on Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: Unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition by W. Tecumseh Fitch. Physics of Life Reviews 11(3). 375–376.

  • Hough, Julian. 2015. Modelling incremental self-repair processing in dialogue. Ph.D Queen Mary University of London.

  • Hough, Julian & Matther Purver. 2017. Probabilistic record type lattices for incremental reference processing. In S. Chatzikyriakidis & Z. Luo (eds.), Modern perspectives in type-theoretical semantics. New York: Springer.

  • Hough, Julian & Matthew Purver. 2014. Probabilistic type theory for incremental dialogue processing. In R. Cooper, S. Dobnik & S. Lappin (eds.), Proceedings of the EACL 2014 workshop on Type Theory and Natural Language Semantics, 80–88. Gothenburg: ACL 2016.

  • Hurley, Susan. 1998. Consciousness in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Kalatzis, Dimitrios, Arash Eshghi & Oliver Lemon. 2016. Bootstrapping incremental dialogue systems: Using linguistic knowledge to learn from minimal data. Proceedings of the NIPS 2016 workshop on Learning Methods for Dialogue. Barcelona.

  • Kempen, Gerard. 2014. Prolegomena to a neurocomputational architecture for human grammatical encoding and decoding. Neuroinformatics 12. 111–142.

  • Kempen, Gerard, Nomi Olsthoorn & Simone Sprenger. 2012. Grammatical workspace sharing during language production and language comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(3). 345–380.

  • Kempson, Ruth. 1996. Semantics, pragmatics and deduction. In S. Lappin (ed.) The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, 561–598. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Kempson, Ruth & Jieun Kiaer. 2010. Multiple long-distance dependent scrambling: Syntax as reflections of processing. Journal of Linguistics 46. 127–192.

  • Kempson, Ruth, Ronnie Cann, Arash Eshghi, Eleni Gregoromichelaki & Matthew Purver. 2015. Ellipsis. In S. Lappin & C. Fox (eds.), Handbook of contemporary semantics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Kempson, Ruth, Andrew Gargett & Eleni Gregoromichelaki. 2007. Clarification requests: An incremental account. Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (Decalog 2007).

  • Kempson, Ruth & Eleni Gregoromichelaki. in press. Action sequences instead of representational levels: Commentary on branigan & pickering. Brain & Behavioral Sciences.

  • Kempson, Ruth, Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Arash Eshghi & Julian Hough. forthcoming. Dynamics of ellipsis in situated interaction. In J. Craenenbroek & T. Temmerman (eds.), Handbook of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kempson, Ruth, Wilfried Meyer-Viol & Dov Gabbay. 2001. Dynamic syntax: The flow of language understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Kleist, Heinrich von. 1951. On the gradual construction of thoughts during speech. German Life and Letters 5(1). 42–46. Translated by Hamburger M.

  • Kobele, Gregory, 2012a. Eliding the derivation: A minimalist formalization of ellipsis. In S. Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG 2012 Conference Chungnam National University Daejeon, 307–324. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Kobele, Gregory, 2012b. Ellipsis: Computation of. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 3(3). 411–418.

  • Kobele, Gregory 2015. LF copying without LF. Lingua 166(part B). 236–259.

  • Kobele, Gregory, Sabrina Gerth & John T. Hale. 2013. Memory resource allocation in top-down minimalist parsing. In G. Morrill & MJ. Nederhof (eds.), Formal grammar. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8036. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Larsson, Staffan. 2003. The information-state approach to dialogue management. In D. Traum & S. Larsson (eds.) Current and new directions in dialogue, 325–353.

  • Larsson, Staffan. 2011. The TTR perceptron: Dynamic perceptual meanings and semantic coordination. Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (SemDial 2011 – Los Angelogue), 140–148.

  • Lerner, Gene 2004. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: Grammar as action in prompting a speaker to elaborate. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37(2). 151–184.

  • Lewis, Shevaun & Colin Phillips. 2015. Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 44(1). 27–46.

  • Lombardo, V. & P. Sturt 2002. Towards a dynamic version of TAG. Proceedings of the Sixth international workshop on tree adjoining grammar and related formalisms. Universit‘a di Venezia.

  • Ludlow, Peter. 2005. A note on alleged cases of nonsentential assertion. In R. Elugardo & R. J. Stainton (eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech, 95–108. Netherlands: Springer.

  • Marr, David. 1982. Vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Marti, Luisa 2006. Unarticulated constituents revisited. Linguistics and Philosophy 29. 135. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Mazzei, Alessandro, Vincenzo Lombardo & Patrick Sturt. 2007. Dynamic TAG and lexical dependencies. Research on Language and Computation 5(3). 309–332.

  • Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27. 661–738.

  • Merchant, Jason. 2010. Three kinds of ellipsis. In F. Recanati, I. Stojanovic & N. Villanueva (eds.), Context-dependence, perspective, and relativity, 152. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Milkowski, Marcin. 2013. Explaining the computational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Mills, Gregory J. 2011. The emergence of procedural conventions in dialogue. Cognitive Science Society Conference (COGSCI) 33. 471476.

  • Mills, Gregory J. & Eleni Gregoromichelaki. 2010. Establishing coherence in dialogue: Sequentiality, intentions and negotiation. In P. Lupkowski & M. Purver (eds.), Aspects of semantics and pragmatics of dialogue (SemDial), 1724. Poznan: Polish Society for Cognitive Science.

  • Morrill, Glyn. 2011. Categorial grammar: Logical syntax, semantics, and processing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Morrill, Glyn & Valentin Oriol. 2015. Multiplicative-additive focusing for parsing as deduction. In I. Cervesato & C. Schürmann (eds.), First International Workshop on Focusing, 29–54. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science series. DOI: 10,4204/EPCTS.197.4

  • O’Grady, William. 2005. Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax. London: Routledge.

  • Perruchet, Pierre & Arnaud Rey. 2005. Does the mastery of center-embedded linguistic structures distinguish humans from nonhuman primates? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12(2). 307–313.

  • Poesio, Massimo & Hannes Rieser. 2010. Completions, co-ordination and alignment in dialogue. Dialogue and Discourse 1. 1–89.

  • Progovac, Ljiljana. 2006. The syntax of nonsententials: Small clauses and phrases at the root. In L. Progovac, K. Paesani, E. Casielles & E. Barton (eds.), The syntax of nonsententials: Multidisciplinary perspectives, 33–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Purver, Matthew, Ronnie Cann & Ruth Kempson. 2006. Grammars as parsers: Meeting the dialogue challenge. Research on Language and Computation 4. 289–326.

  • Purver, Matthew, Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Wilfried Meyer-Viol & Ronnie Cann. 2010. Splitting the I’s and Crossing the You’s: Context, speech acts and grammar. Proceedings of the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue(PozDial). Poznan, Poland. June 2010.

  • Ranta, Aarne. 2011. Grammatical framework: Programming with multilingual grammars. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

  • Rieser, Hannes 2016. A process algebra account of speech-gesture interaction. MS. University of Bielefeld. DOI:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Sato, Yo. 2011. Local ambiguity, search strategies and parsing in dynamic syntax. In R. Kempson, E. Gregoromichelaki & C. Howes. The dynamics of lexical interfaces, 205–234. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Schober, Michael & Susan Brennan. 2003. Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner. In A. Graesser, M. Garnbacher & S. Goldman (eds.), Handbook of discourse processes, 123–164. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Sehraku, Tohru. 2013. Clefts, relatives, and language dynamics: The case of Japanese. Oxford: DPhil.

  • Sober, Elliott & David Sloan. Wilson 1998. Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Stabler, Ed. 1997. Derivational minimalism. In C. Retoré (ed.), Logical aspects of computational linguistics, 68–95. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Stabler, Ed. 2011. Computational perspectives on minimalism. In C. Boeckx (ed.), Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism, 617–642. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Stabler, Ed. 2013. Two models of minimalist, incremental syntactic analysis. Topics in Cognitive Science DOI: .

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Steedman, Mark. 2000. The syntactic process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Stokhof, Martin & van Lambalgen. Michiel 2011. Abstractions and idealizations: The constructions of modern linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 37(1–2). 1–26.

  • Tomasello, Michael 2008. The origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Weir, Andrew. 2014. Fragments and clausal ellipsis. Diss. University of Massachusetts Amherst.

  • Wilson, David Sloan. 2002 Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion and the nature of society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Yanchao, Yu, Arash Eshghi & Oliver Lemon. 2016. Training an adaptive dialogue policy for interactive learning of visually grounded word meanings. Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2016 Conference, The 17th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, 13-15 September 2016, Los Angeles, CA, 339–349.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


Journal + Issues

Theoretical Linguistics is an open peer review journal. Each issue contains one long target article about a topic of general linguistic interest, together with several shorter reactions, comments and reflections on it. With this format, the journal aims to stimulate discussion in linguistics and adjacent fields of study, in particular across schools of different theoretical orientations.

Search