On type composition and agentivity

  • 1 Institute for German Language and Literature, Albertus Magnus Platz, Cologne, Germany
Petra B. Schumacher
  • Corresponding author
  • Institute for German Language and Literature, University of Cologne, Albertus Magnus Platz, Cologne, D-50923, Germany
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Asher, Nicholas. 2011. Lexical meaning in context: A web of words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bierwisch, Manfred. 1988. On the grammar of local prepositions. In M. Bierwisch et al. (eds.), Syntax, Semantik und Lexikon, 1–65. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dowty, David R. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67. 547–619.

  • Frisson, Steven. 2009. Semantic underspecification in language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 111–127.

  • Leach, Edmund R. 1964. Anthropological aspects of language: Animal categories and verbal insults. In E. H. Lenneberg (ed.), New direction in the study of language, 23–63. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Leslie, Alan M. 1995. A theory of agency. In D. Sperber et al. (eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate, 121–141, Oxford. Clarendon Press.

  • Lowder, Matthew W. & Peter C. Gordon. 2015. Natural forces as agents: Reconceptualizing the animate–Inanimate distinction. Cognition 136. 85–90.

  • Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1979. The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy 3. 143–184.

  • Partee, Barbara H. 1987. Noun phrase interpretation and type shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers, 115–143. Dordrecht: Foris.

  • Primus, Beatrice. 2012. Animacy, generalized semantic roles and differential object marking. In M. Lamers & P. de Swart (eds.), Case, word order, and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension, 65–90. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Schumacher, Petra B. 2011. The hepatitis called …: Electrophysiological evidence for enriched composition. In J. Meibauer & M. Steinbach (eds.), Experimental Pragmatics/Semantics, 199–219. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Schumacher, Petra B. 2013. When combinatorial processing results in reconceptualization: Toward a new approach of compositionality. Frontiers in Psychology 4. 677. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Schumacher, Petra B. 2014. Content and context in incremental processing: “the ham sandwich” revisited. Philosophical Studies 168. 151–165.

  • Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R.M.W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.

  • de Swart, Henriëtte, Yoad Winter & Joost Zwarts. 2007. Bare nominals and reference to capacities. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25. 195–222.

  • Weckerly, Jill & Marta Kutas. 1999. An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology 36. 559–570.

  • Weiland-Breckle, Hanna & Petra B. Schumacher. 2017. Artist-for-work metonymy: Type clash or underspecification? Mental Lexicon 12. 219–233.

  • Yamamoto, Mutsumi. 1999. Animacy and reference: A cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Zhang, Yaxu, Jinlu Zhang & Baoquan Min. 2012. Neural dynamics of animacy processing in language comprehension: ERP evidence from the interpretation of classifier–noun combinations. Brain and Language 120. 321–331.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.

Journal + Issues

Theoretical Linguistics is an open peer review journal. Each issue contains one long target article about a topic of general linguistic interest, together with several shorter reactions, comments and reflections on it. With this format, the journal aims to stimulate discussion in linguistics and adjacent fields of study, in particular across schools of different theoretical orientations.