Following an introduction to ellipsis and its consequences both for communication and for the theory of grammar, this paper addresses a number of issues which have been debated in the linguistic literature on ellipsis, namely structure, identity and licensing. This study brings to the readers’ attention the effects which such conditions have for the study of ellipsis in different languages as well as their constraints within the generative framework. As case studies on the conditions and the characterisation of the linguistic strategy under scrutiny, this paper also summarises the main approaches to ellipsis in the studies embodied in this special issue.
Abeillé, Anne, Gabriella Bîlbîie & François Mouret. 2011. A romance perspective on gapping constructions. In Hans Boas & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds.), Romance in construction grammar, 227–265. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2009. You have the right to remain silent. The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Brussels: Catholic University of Brussels dissertation.
Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2010. The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bîlbîie, Gabriela. 2011. Grammaire des constructions elliptiques. Une étude comparative des phrases sans verbe en roumain et en français. Paris: Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7 dissertation.
Chung, Sandra. 2006. Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return. In Rebecca T. Cover & Yuni Kim (eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 31 (BLS), 73–91. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Chung, Sandra. 2013. Syntactic identity in sluicing: How much, and why. Linguistic Inquiry 44. 1–39.
Coppock, Elizabeth. 2001. Gapping: In defense of deletion. In Mary Andronis, Christopher Ball, Heidi Elston & Sylvain Neuvel (eds.), Proceedings of Chicago linguistic society 37, 133–148. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dalrymple, Mary. 2005. Against reconstruction in ellipsis. In Reinaldo Elugardo & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech, 31–55. Dordrecht: Springer.
Dalrymple, Mary. 2005. Against reconstruction in ellipsis. In Reinaldo Elugardo & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech, 31–55. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-2301-4_2)| false
Johnson, Kyle. 2001. What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why. In Martin Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 439–479. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756416.ch14)| false
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and head movement. Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sag, Ivan A. 1976. Deletion and logical form. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Thoms, Gary. 2010. Tolerated lexical mismatches in ellipsis. Glasgow: Strathclyde University Ms.
Thoms, Gary. 2011. ‘Verb floating’ and VP-ellipsis: Towards a movement account of ellipsis licensing. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), Linguistic variation yearbook 2010, 252–297. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thoms, Gary. 2013. Lexical mismatches in ellipsis and the identity condition. In Stefan Keine & Shayne Sloggett (eds.), Proceedings of the Forty-Second Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS 42). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications. http://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/lexical-mismatches-in-ellipsis-and-the-identity-condition(17c4ad10-23ac-44ac-8c4d-1c0e3a4e6fa3).html
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2010. The syntax of ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch dialects. New York: Oxford University Press.
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Jason Merchant. 2013. Ellipsis phenomena. In Marcel den Dikken (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, 701–745. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, Edwin. 1977. Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1). 101–139.
Winkler, Susanne. 2005. Ellipsis and focus in generative grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zagona, Karen. 1982. Government and proper government of verbal projections. Seattle, WA: University of Washington dissertation.
We are grateful to the following institutions for generous financial support: the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the European Regional Development Fund (grant no. FFI2013-44065-P), and the Autonomous Government of Galicia (grant no. GPC2014/060).
The Linguistic Review publishes high-quality papers in syntax, semantics, phonology and morphology within a framework of Generative Grammar and related disciplines, as well as critical discussions of theoretical linguistics as a branch of cognitive psychology. The journal welcomes reviews of important new monographs in these areas, dissertation abstracts and letters to the editor.