Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
A defense of hierachy in different spheres of our life from the personal to the political and among relations between intimates, citizens, countries, humans, and animals, drawing on the China's history, traditions, and institutions.

Bell, Daniel / Pei, Wang

Just Hierarchy

Why Social Hierarchies Matter in China and the Rest of the World

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS

    48,95 € / $56.25 / £48.00*

    eBook (PDF)
    Publication Date:
    2020
    Copyright year:
    2020
    To be published:
    February 2020
    ISBN
    978-0-691-20088-0
    See all formats and pricing

    Overview

    Aims and Scope

    A trenchant defense of hierarchy in different spheres of our lives, from the personal to the political

    All complex and large-scale societies are organized along certain hierarchies, but the concept of hierarchy has become almost taboo in the modern world. Just Hierarchy contends that this stigma is a mistake. In fact, as Daniel Bell and Wang Pei show, it is neither possible nor advisable to do away with social hierarchies. Drawing their arguments from Chinese thought and culture as well as other philosophies and traditions, Bell and Wang ask which forms of hierarchy are justified and how these can serve morally desirable goals. They look at ways of promoting just forms of hierarchy while minimizing the influence of unjust ones, such as those based on race, sex, or caste.

    Which hierarchical relations are morally justified and why? Bell and Wang argue that it depends on the nature of the social relation and context. Different hierarchical principles ought to govern different kinds of social relations: what justifies hierarchy among intimates is different than what justifies hierarchy among citizens, countries, humans and animals, and humans and intelligent machines. Morally justified hierarchies can and should govern different spheres of our social lives, though these will be very different than the unjust hierarchies that have governed us in the past.

    A vigorous, systematic defense of hierarchy in the modern world, Just Hierarchy examines how hierarchical social relations can have a useful purpose, not only in personal domains but also in larger political realms.

    Details

    2 b/w illus.
    PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS
    Language:
    English
    Keyword(s):
    Political thought; Yan Xuetong; Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power; Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times; Joseph Chan; Tongdong Bai; Against Political Equality: The Confucian Case; egalitarianism; relationships; friends; lovers; family members; housekeepers; context; power; competitive elections; meritocracy; system; ancient India; ancient China; global order; equal; equality; domesticated; subordinate; subordination; eating animals; humane; exploit; exploitation; Marx; artificial intelligence; ethics; Silicon Valley; Communist; communism; democracy; liberal; Princeton-China Series
    Readership:
    General/trade;Professional and scholarly;College/higher education;

    More ...

    Daniel A. Bell is dean of the School of Political Science and Public Administration at Shandong University in Qingdao and professor at Tsinghua University in Beijing. His previous books include The China Model (Princeton). Wang Pei is assistant professor at the China Institute at Fudan University in Shanghai.

    Reviews

    "Issues of hierarchy and equality are major contemporary concerns, with the predominant voice arguing for equality and against hierarchy. This provocative and significant book goes against that trend and makes a distinctive move in defending hierarchy. Persuasively making its case from crosscultural perspectives, Just Hierarchy is nevertheless controversial and will cause serious debate."—Chenyang Li, author of The Confucian Philosophy of Harmony

    "Just Hierarchy is intellectually very stimulating. It invites us to revisit some our most entrenched assumptions about the notion of hierarchy. The book is clear, easy to read, entertaining, and extremely topical."—Jean-Marc Coicaud, Rutgers University

    Comments (0)

    Please log in or register to comment.
    Log in